I once spent a week convinced that a specific transit pass in a city where I was working as a refugee resettlement advisor required a physical stamp from a notary. I told three families they couldn’t travel across the border until Tuesday because the notary was out on a fishing trip.
I was wrong. I had hallucinated a requirement based on a single, off-hand comment made by a weary desk clerk who had been there since the . I had prioritized the “way it’s always been” over the actual, written law, and in doing so, I became the very obstacle I claimed to hate.
I had confused a habit with a mandate, and I let three families sit in a cramped terminal for longer than necessary because I didn’t have the sense to ask where the rule was actually written down.
The Danger of the Unwritten
That is the danger of the unwritten. We assume that because a rule isn’t codified in a leather-bound manual, it must be flexible, but the inverse is almost always true. A written rule has an author, a date of birth, and usually, a sunset clause or a review cycle. It can be challenged because its